optionsnas.blogg.se - Norton ghost 11 windows 7

Norton ghost 11 windows 7 install#
Norton ghost 11 windows 7 drivers#
Norton ghost 11 windows 7 full#
Norton ghost 11 windows 7 trial#

When an image is made with Acrons, everything gets backed up/restored.

Norton ghost 11 windows 7 install#

I only use the VM so I can get the bootable ISO without have to install the software live.

Norton ghost 11 windows 7 drivers#

Give both a go, in a virtual machine if you don't wanna install new **** on your computer (VMWare Player is free and can now create VM's), and decide by trial.Ĭorrect me if I am wrong, but wouldn't you have to install all drivers and software manually after restoring? With this method you are essentailly just copying basic Windows files.

Norton ghost 11 windows 7 trial#

That said, both Acronis and Norton offer trial versions of their products. Probably the only new feature you'll see in ATI 2011 and NG 16 will be mandatory product activation. Now they're too far into the business end of things and forgot what made TI so good in the first place. It's sad that I have to say this, because I remember having really high hopes for Acronis because they used to listen to their users and were turning the software backup industry on it's head. It works just fine, is easy to use, has a nice no-bull**** UI, and it creates a fast restore CD or lets me add it to BartPE, WinBuilder, or WAIK if I want to. Honestly, that's my sincere recommendation. My best recommendation: go with an older version of Acronis TI if you can get a hold of one. Startup times are longer, the core feature hasn't changed (just need to image my ****in' computer), and they still lack obvious niceties (Norton still can't send a ****in' email notification through Gmail SMTP (or any SSL SMTP server, for that matter) it's 2010, ffs, that's a no-brainer feature). MS still hasn't fixed the fuzzy sub-pixel text-rendering issue and that, combined with the service-based background processes, makes the UI's noticeably slow compared to normal Windows applications and previous versions of both applications. They both install server services on your computer the server component is required just for the user interfaces to function. As tuxplorer said, both NG and ATI have become needlessly bloated. For example, O&O SafeErase 3 was a wonderful, simple, functional product Version 4 absolutely ruined the product simply to give it a pretty UI I, a paying customer, got kicked out of their support forum for telling them about it.

Software companies seem be losing sight of what makes software good.

Is it true that Norton Ghost is much easier/simpler to use than Acronis?That's a subjective question, but I find NG 15 to be easier to use than ATI 2010, though I think both suck. I would like to share 2 links with forum members that I came across and while doing this little research. Will be very thankful for your help/reply/guidance.

Is it true that Norton Ghost is much easier/simpler to use than Acronis?.

I assume Norton Ghost 15 also offers this feature? Does Acronis also offer this feature?

Norton Ghost 12 allows the user to boot from a CD and restore from a saved image.

What is SID and what are the benefits of SID

While searching (before making this post) i came across the term SID and the sentence that "The Paragon and Norton Ghost both have a Change SID option".

Norton ghost 11 windows 7 full#

Which one produces small images when used with full compression.

I have been using Norton Ghost on XP for about 2 years and am inclined towards it.

What is the difference between cloning and imaging.

I know there's plenty of material out there but my questions are probably very basic and maybe not covered in all the stuff that i ran into.

I would like to go with one of these on my Windows 7 PC (64-bit). I am making this posting after spending a good amount of time searching on the net and on this forum.